The Liberal Democrats, Conservative Party, Green Party and Labour Party have all released election manifestos – but what’s in there for the Cultural and Creative Industries?
In April 2024 Creative UK launched our manifesto – Our Creative Future – with six key areas we want to see political parties address. Here, we’ve done a headline review to see how key publications stack up for the sector when it comes to commitments parties are making regarding potential future action. Updates to this review will be added once further manifestos are published.
We said: To achieve the UK Government target of one million new jobs by 2030, a culture-rich education – complete with skills-focussed careers guidance – should be available to young people from all backgrounds to ensure a diverse, skilled talent pool for the future.
The Liberal Democrats want to:
The Conservative Party want to:
The Green Party want to:
The Labour Party want to:
We said: Strengthening protections for freelancers and appointing a Freelancing Commissioner will provide better support for people who work in this way. If we get this right, it will serve as a blueprint for more successful UK-wide self-employment.
The Liberal Democrats want to:
The Conservative Party want to:
The Green Party want to:
The Labour Party want to:
We said: Make the UK the best place to build and retain creative talent and their businesses. Return the arts share of National Lottery funds to 25% and create and maintain genuinely competitive fiscal reliefs and incentives.
The Liberal Democrats wants to:
The Conservative Party want to:
The Green Party want to:
The Labour Party want to:
We said: To achieve the UK Government target of one million new jobs by 2030, a culture-rich education – complete with skills-focussed careers guidance – should be available to young people from all backgrounds to ensure a diverse, skilled talent pool for the future.
The Liberal Democrats want to:
The Conservative Party want to:
The Green Party want to:
The Labour Party want to:
We said: Strengthening protections for freelancers and appointing a Freelancing Commissioner will provide better support for people who work in this way. If we get this right, it will serve as a blueprint for more successful UK-wide self-employment.
The Liberal Democrats want to:
The Conservative Party want to:
The Green Party want to:
The Labour Party want to:
We said: Make the UK the best place to build and retain creative talent and their businesses. Return the arts share of National Lottery funds to 25% and create and maintain genuinely competitive fiscal reliefs and incentives.
The Liberal Democrats wants to:
The Conservative Party want to:
The Green Party want to:
The Labour Party want to:
We said: Facilitate innovation by investing in research and development (R&D) funding, and supporting new products, services and intellectual property.
The Liberal Democrats want to spend 3% of the UK’s gross domestic product (GDP) as minimum in R&D by 2030, rising to 3.5% by 2034.
The Conservative Party want to increase public spending on R&D to £22 billion a year, up from £20 billion this year
The Green Party want to increase investment into R&D by over £30 billion in the lifetime of the five-year parliament (focused on tackling climate crisis)
The Labour Party want to set ten-year budgets for key R&D institutions
We said: Enable innovation and provide security for creatives by protecting Intellectual Property (IP). IP is the lifeblood of the sector – and the UK Government must uphold the UK’s existing gold-standard framework.
The Liberal Democrats said they would create a cross-sectoral regulatory framework for artificial intelligence (AI) that “promotes innovation while creating certainty for AI users, developers and investors”. They would also negotiate the UK’s participation in the Trade and Technology Council with the US and the EU, so the UK “can play a leading role in global AI regulation, and work with international partners in agreeing common standards for AI risk and impact assessment, testing, monitoring and audit”.
The Conservative Party said they would ensure creators are properly protected and remunerated for their work, whilst also making the most of the opportunities of AI and its applications for creativity in the future.
The Green Party said they are committed to the protection of the Intellectual Property of artists, writers and musicians and other creators. They would ensure that “AI does not erode the value of human creativity and that workers’ rights and interests are respected when AI leads to significant changes in working conditions.”
The Labour Party said they would ensure industrial strategy supports the development of the AI sector and removes planning barriers to new data centres. They would create a National Data Library to bring together existing research programmes and help deliver data-driven public services, whilst maintaining strong safeguards and ensuring all of the public benefit. They would create a new Regulatory Innovation Office, bringing together existing functions across government, to update regulation, approval timelines, and co-ordination of issues spanning existing boundaries.
We said: Strengthen the UK’s standing on the world stage with easy movement of people, goods and services as well as supporting trade and exports.
The Liberal Democrats said they want to negotiate free and simple short-term travel arrangements for UK artists to perform in the EU, and European artists to perform in the UK.
The Conservative Party said they would not allow any form of free movement to return.
The Green Party said they want to ensure that musicians have access to visa-free travel to the EU through negotiating a reciprocal arrangement at the earliest possible opportunity. They would also seek to re-join the EU as soon as the political conditions are right.
The Labour Party said they would help [the UK’s] touring artists; and secure a mutual recognition agreement for professional qualifications to help open up markets for UK service exporters. They said that Britain will stay outside of the EU, “[b]ut to seize the opportunities ahead…we will reset the relationship and seek to deepen ties with our European friends, neighbours and allies. […] There will be no return to the single market, the customs union, or freedom of movement. Instead, Labour will work to improve the UK’s trade and investment relationship with the EU, by tearing down unnecessary barriers to trade.”
We said: Facilitate innovation by investing in research and development (R&D) funding, and supporting new products, services and intellectual property.
The Liberal Democrats want to spend 3% of the UK’s gross domestic product (GDP) as minimum in R&D by 2030, rising to 3.5% by 2034.
The Conservative Party want to increase public spending on R&D to £22 billion a year, up from £20 billion this year
The Green Party want to increase investment into R&D by over £30 billion in the lifetime of the five-year parliament (focused on tackling climate crisis)
The Labour Party want to set ten-year budgets for key R&D institutions
We said: Enable innovation and provide security for creatives by protecting Intellectual Property (IP). IP is the lifeblood of the sector – and the UK Government must uphold the UK’s existing gold-standard framework.
The Liberal Democrats said they would create a cross-sectoral regulatory framework for artificial intelligence (AI) that “promotes innovation while creating certainty for AI users, developers and investors”. They would also negotiate the UK’s participation in the Trade and Technology Council with the US and the EU, so the UK “can play a leading role in global AI regulation, and work with international partners in agreeing common standards for AI risk and impact assessment, testing, monitoring and audit”.
The Conservative Party said they would ensure creators are properly protected and remunerated for their work, whilst also making the most of the opportunities of AI and its applications for creativity in the future.
The Green Party said they are committed to the protection of the Intellectual Property of artists, writers and musicians and other creators. They would ensure that “AI does not erode the value of human creativity and that workers’ rights and interests are respected when AI leads to significant changes in working conditions.”
The Labour Party said they would ensure industrial strategy supports the development of the AI sector and removes planning barriers to new data centres. They would create a National Data Library to bring together existing research programmes and help deliver data-driven public services, whilst maintaining strong safeguards and ensuring all of the public benefit. They would create a new Regulatory Innovation Office, bringing together existing functions across government, to update regulation, approval timelines, and co-ordination of issues spanning existing boundaries.
We said: Strengthen the UK’s standing on the world stage with easy movement of people, goods and services as well as supporting trade and exports.
The Liberal Democrats said they want to negotiate free and simple short-term travel arrangements for UK artists to perform in the EU, and European artists to perform in the UK.
The Conservative Party said they would not allow any form of free movement to return.
The Green Party said they want to ensure that musicians have access to visa-free travel to the EU through negotiating a reciprocal arrangement at the earliest possible opportunity. They would also seek to re-join the EU as soon as the political conditions are right.
The Labour Party said they would help [the UK’s] touring artists; and secure a mutual recognition agreement for professional qualifications to help open up markets for UK service exporters. They said that Britain will stay outside of the EU, “[b]ut to seize the opportunities ahead…we will reset the relationship and seek to deepen ties with our European friends, neighbours and allies. […] There will be no return to the single market, the customs union, or freedom of movement. Instead, Labour will work to improve the UK’s trade and investment relationship with the EU, by tearing down unnecessary barriers to trade.”
The Liberal Democrats said they would protect the BBC, S4C, BBC Alba and Channel 4 as “independent, publicly owned, public service broadcasters” and would “properly [fund] the impartial BBC World Service from the Foreign Office budget and restoring its global reach”. They would also support the BBC “both to provide impartial news and information, and to take a leading role in increasing media literacy and educating all generations in tackling the impact of fake news”. They would require at least 80% of on-demand TV content to be subtitled, 10% audio-described and 5% signed.
The Conservative Party said that the “BBC should represent the perspectives of the entire nation with diversity of thought, accuracy and impartiality as its guiding principles.” They would “carefully consider the findings of the [BBC] Funding Review ahead of the next Royal Charter and ensure it upholds these principles”. They would also introduce a new complaints process for the BBC.
The Labour Party said they want to “work constructively with the BBC and our other public service broadcasters so they continue to inform, educate and entertain people, and support the creative economy by commissioning distinctively British content.”
The Liberal Democrats want to:
The Conservative Party want to:
The Green Party want to:
The Labour Party want to:
The Liberal Democrats said they want to replace the immigration salary threshold with a more flexible merit-based system for work visas, “working with employers in each sector to address specific needs as part of a long-term workforce strategy that also focuses on education and training to address skills gaps from within the UK.”
The Conservative Party said they want to halve migration and introduce “a binding, legal cap on migration, set on work and family visas…[t]he cap will fall every year of the next Parliament, and Parliament would have an annual vote on the level of the cap. They would increase all visa fees and remove the student discount to the Immigration Health Surcharge. They would raise the Skilled Worker threshold and Family income requirement with inflation automatically.
The Green Party said they would bring an end to minimum income requirements for spouses of those holding work visas.
The Labour Party said they would “reform the points-based immigration system…with appropriate restrictions on visas, and by linking immigration and skills policy”. They would “strengthen” the Migration Advisory Committee, establishing a framework for joint working with skills bodies across the UK, the UK Government’s Industrial Strategy Council and the UK Government’s Department for Work & Pensions (DWP).
The Liberal Democrats said they would protect the BBC, S4C, BBC Alba and Channel 4 as “independent, publicly owned, public service broadcasters” and would “properly [fund] the impartial BBC World Service from the Foreign Office budget and restoring its global reach”. They would also support the BBC “both to provide impartial news and information, and to take a leading role in increasing media literacy and educating all generations in tackling the impact of fake news”. They would require at least 80% of on-demand TV content to be subtitled, 10% audio-described and 5% signed.
The Conservative Party said that the “BBC should represent the perspectives of the entire nation with diversity of thought, accuracy and impartiality as its guiding principles.” They would “carefully consider the findings of the [BBC] Funding Review ahead of the next Royal Charter and ensure it upholds these principles”. They would also introduce a new complaints process for the BBC.
The Labour Party said they want to “work constructively with the BBC and our other public service broadcasters so they continue to inform, educate and entertain people, and support the creative economy by commissioning distinctively British content.”
The Liberal Democrats want to:
The Conservative Party want to:
The Green Party want to:
The Labour Party want to:
The Liberal Democrats said they want to replace the immigration salary threshold with a more flexible merit-based system for work visas, “working with employers in each sector to address specific needs as part of a long-term workforce strategy that also focuses on education and training to address skills gaps from within the UK.”
The Conservative Party said they want to halve migration and introduce “a binding, legal cap on migration, set on work and family visas…[t]he cap will fall every year of the next Parliament, and Parliament would have an annual vote on the level of the cap. They would increase all visa fees and remove the student discount to the Immigration Health Surcharge. They would raise the Skilled Worker threshold and Family income requirement with inflation automatically.
The Green Party said they would bring an end to minimum income requirements for spouses of those holding work visas.
The Labour Party said they would “reform the points-based immigration system…with appropriate restrictions on visas, and by linking immigration and skills policy”. They would “strengthen” the Migration Advisory Committee, establishing a framework for joint working with skills bodies across the UK, the UK Government’s Industrial Strategy Council and the UK Government’s Department for Work & Pensions (DWP).
Long awaited cross-party recognition of the cultural and creative industries as a fundamental driver of socio-economic change appears in some manifesto content, in some ways. But seeing creativity as the key to equipping generations coming through as critical to tackling our most complex problems right across the UK’s opportunities both domestically and internationally is not yet there in full, across political party thinking, but a pragmatic perspective is that there is plenty of prospective action. For the next UK Government, the opportunity that exists is not merely to recognise the cultural and creative industries as central to how we strengthen, grow and ensure resilience in the UK – but to proactively and systematically intervene to turbo-charge the creative sector. This must happen right alongside generating effective and positive impact globally through our hard and soft power.
While much of the creative sector trades in physical goods, the cultural and creative industries are a major trader of services and intellectual property – also relying on the movement of its creative workforce to facilitate the exchange of ideas and services. Continued restriction, however, on the movement of people could continue to limit the flow of inbound and outbound talent essential to the cultural and creative industries. Several measures could provide increased stability for growth, encouraging investment in innovation and sustainability initiatives in particular – while also looking to ensure that public investment catalyses greater private investment too.
There is positive movement in some political party thinking on education – including reform of accountability measures – although as expected not enough detail about the people and resources needed to make things happen, which is the case across most manifesto content. This includes the identification, in some manifesto elements, of the transformative ways in which access to development of creativity and critical thinking, as well as support for cultural experiences, collectively amplifies our problem-solving capability, our health and wellbeing and our ability to innovate – socially, culturally, economically.
Some proposals cross into longstanding and overdue debates about the need to clarify and act on support for people who are working – as well as cutting into very complex debates about what best enables flexibility, personal choice and freedom – while also enabling dynamic, agile and high impact models of working. Importantly, there isn’t as much indicated as we’d hoped for in acknowledging the need to increase the diversity of people who work in the cultural and creative industries in the labour market (in particular, freelancers and the self-employed) – critical, for the UK to strengthen what it is we create, how we make it and who we make things for – and to compete globally.
All political parties have an important role to play in driving forward policy debate through this General Election and beyond.
It is crucial that whoever forms the next UK Government ensures that the cultural and creative industries can deliver on its full potential, and delivers generational social, cultural and economic prosperity across our nation.